The High Court found that the trial court's order temporarily suspending the applicants' bond terms was neither incorrect, improper, nor illegal. The order was justified in light of the prosecution's allegations of witness interference and was limited in duration, pending the taking of evidence from vulnerable witnesses. The subsequent reinstatement of bond terms with additional conditions rendered the revision application moot, as the necessity for intervention had been overtaken by events. The court emphasized the importance of protecting vulnerable witnesses and the expeditious handling of such matters, concluding that no further determination was required and the High Court file should be closed.