NICODEMUS OCHIENG V INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION & 2 OTHERS [2013] KEHC 5195 (KLR) | Nomination Disputes | Esheria

NICODEMUS OCHIENG V INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION & 2 OTHERS [2013] KEHC 5195 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)

Petition 32 of 2013 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>

Normal 0

false false false

EN-ZA X-NONE X-NONE

</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; text-align:justify; text-indent:-17. 85pt; line-height:200%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]

NICODEMUS OCHIENG..................................................................................................PETITIONER

AND

THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORALAND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION...........1ST RESPONDENT

ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT...............................................................2ND  RESPONDENT

PETER ANYUL IMWATOK ...................................................................................3RD RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

1. We heard this matter on 31st January 2013 and allowed the petition. We therefore directed the IEBC to rehear the matter. We now proffer the reasons for our decision.

2. The petitioner’s complaint is that he won the ODM nomination contest for the Makongeni Ward County Assembly Representative in the primaries held on 18th January 2013. His win was disputed by the 3rd respondent, Peter Onyul Imwatok.

3. The petitioner’s case was the subject of proceedings before the IEBC Tribunal and was determined on the basis that ODM conceded that elections were irregular and on that basis the 3rd respondent was issued with the nomination certificate.

4. The petitioner raised the issue that he was not properly served and on consideration of the material before us, we were so satisfied as the Notice issued in the newspaper, though it related to Makongeni ward, did not show the petitioner’s name. We therefore directed the matter be reheard.

DatedandDelivered at Nairobithis 5th February 2013

D.S. MAJANJA

JUDGE

W. KORIR

JUDGE

G. V. ODUNGA

JUDGE