Njagi & 9 others v Invesco Assurance Company Limited [2023] KEHC 26754 (KLR) | Company Liquidation | Esheria

Njagi & 9 others v Invesco Assurance Company Limited [2023] KEHC 26754 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Njagi & 9 others v Invesco Assurance Company Limited (Insolvency Petition E015 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 26754 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (21 December 2023) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 26754 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)

Commercial and Tax

Insolvency Petition E015 of 2019

A Mabeya, J

December 21, 2023

Between

Salesio Kinyanjui Njagi

1st Petitioner

Gregory Mwaniki Karunga

2nd Petitioner

Alisa Njeri

3rd Petitioner

Jackleah Wangari

4th Petitioner

Nyaga Nthia

5th Petitioner

Alice Kageni Ndwiga

6th Petitioner

Emmaculate Wanjiru Marigu

7th Petitioner

Juliet Muthoni Nthiga

8th Petitioner

Vanessa Kambi

9th Petitioner

Nancy Muthoni Kinyua

10th Petitioner

and

Invesco Assurance Company Limited

Respondent

Ruling

1. Before me is a Consent dated 11/12/2023 by the parties. They seek to set aside the Liquidation Order made on 18/10/2023 that took effect on or about 31/10/2023 when the Company defaulted on a Consent Order of 18/10/2023.

2. The grounds for that Consent is that the Company has since paid the instalments ordered and has entered into an arrangement with the petitioner on how to settle the debt. It was submitted that the parties had entered into a similar consent before the Malindi Court thereby lifting another Liquidation Order made by that Court.

3. I have considered the consent and the representations by Learned Counsel. I point out here that liquidation petitions are not to be used to arm twist debtors to pay or settle. Once a petitioner has decided that a debtor Company should be liquidated, it is insensitive for such a petitioner to turn back and say “oh wait a minute, I have received my money back. Hold the process.” That is not available.

4. A Liquidation Petition as is Liquidation Order is serious business. Advertising any of the same has serious consequences to the debtor Company. In public interest, a company that should go under in all fairness it should be left to go rather than be left to sink deeper into debt.

5. In the present case, I have considered that it is in the public interest that I reverse the Liquidation Order. However, the same will not be in terms of the consent. I hereby lift the Liquidation order of 18/10/2023. I discharge the Official Receiver from his duties as a liquidator of the Company forthwith and require him to surrender back the premises of the Company to its directors.

6. The matter is marked as settled and file closed.It is so ordered.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023. A. MABEYA, FCI ArbJUDGE