Ofwono Samuel v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 17 of 2004) [2005] UGSC 27 (21 December 2005)

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff35\stshfdbch0\stshfloch35\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;} {\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}{\f273\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f274\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f276\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;} {\f277\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f278\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f279\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f280\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;} {\f281\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f623\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f624\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f626\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f627\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;} {\f628\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);}{\f629\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f630\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f631\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f632\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}} {\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0; \red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;} {\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\loch\f35\hich\af0\dbch\af0\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-473\slmult0 \nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Style1;}{\s16\qc \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Style2;}{\s17\ql \li0\ri0\sl-826\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 Style3;}{\s18\ql \li0\ri0\sl-259\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext18 Style4;}{\s19\ql \fi1800\li0\ri0\sl-864\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext19 Style5;}{ \s20\qc \li0\ri0\sl-564\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext20 Style6;}{\*\cs21 \additive \b\i\f0\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style11;}{\*\cs22 \additive \b\f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style12;}{\*\cs23 \additive \f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style13;}{\*\cs24 \additive \f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style14;}{\*\cs25 \additive \i\f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style15;}{\*\cs26 \additive \b\f35\fs28 \sbasedon10 Font Style16;}{\* \cs27 \additive \b\i\f35\fs20 \sbasedon10 Font Style17;}{\*\cs28 \additive \b\f35\fs30 \sbasedon10 Font Style18;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid1721573\rsid5919264\rsid13646405}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info {\author owner}{\operator owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo2\dy28\hr15\min42}{\revtim\yr2008\mo2\dy28\hr15\min45}{\version3}{\edmins3}{\nofpages5}{\nofwords1268}{\nofchars7232}{\nofcharsws8484}{\vern24689}}\paperw11905\paperh16837\margl1723\margr1723\margt1560 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3\jcompress\viewkind1\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot1721573 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5919264 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5919264 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5919264 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5919264 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \sbknone\linex0\colsx60\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid1721573\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5919264 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s20\qc \li1291\ri1282\sb77\sl-562\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin1282\lin1291\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs28\b\fs30\insrsid5919264 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA }{\cs28\b\fs30\insrsid1721573 \par \par }{\cs28\b\fs30\insrsid5919264 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA }{\cs28\b\fs30\insrsid1721573 \par }{\cs28\b\fs30\insrsid5919264 AT MENGO \par }\pard\plain \s16\qc \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par }\pard \s16\qc \li0\ri0\sb230\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 (CORAM: ODER, TSEKOOKO, KAROKORA, AND MULENGA, \par }\pard \s16\qc \li0\ri0\sb62\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 KANYEIHAMBA, JJ. SC.) \par }\pard\plain \s19\qc \li0\ri0\sb240\sl-864\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5919264 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs22\b\fs22\ul\insrsid5919264 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2004\line }{ \cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 OFWONO SAMUEL}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 ::::::::::::::::::: VS }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 ::::::::::: UGANDA \par }\pard\plain \s18\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par }\pard \s18\qj \li0\ri0\sb211\sl-259\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs27\b\i\fs20\insrsid5919264 (An appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal at Kampala (Okello, Eugwau and Kitumba, }{\cs21\b\i\f0\fs22\insrsid5919264 JJ.}{ \cs27\b\i\fs20\insrsid5919264 A) in Criminal Appeal No. 220 of 2002 dated }{\cs25\b\i\fs22\expnd4\expndtw20\insrsid5919264\charrsid1721573 8}{\cs25\b\i\fs22\expnd4\expndtw20\super\insrsid5919264\charrsid1721573 th}{ \cs25\i\fs22\expnd4\expndtw20\super\insrsid5919264 }{\cs27\b\i\fs20\insrsid5919264 November, 2004) \par }\pard\plain \s16\ql \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s16\qc \li0\ri0\sb139\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1721573 {\cs22\b\fs22\ul\insrsid5919264 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb197\sl-494\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 This is a second appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal dism issing the appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence to death by High Court for robbery with aggravation, contrary to sections 285 and 286 (2) of the Penal Code Act. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb235\sl-494\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 The background to the appeal briefly is that on 5/11/99, at about 10.30 p.m at N amataba Zone in Kampala, one Kabaho Nathan (PW 2) and his wife Kabaho Windred (PW 3) returned home in a hired taxi from their shop. When they were at the gate of their house, gunmen emerged, put them at gunpoint and demanded for money. PW 3 surrendered to one of the robbers her handbag containing Shs: \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb53\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 800,000/=. The robbers fired a gun, smashing the windscreen of the taxi car. There was electricity light from security lights of the house. PW 2 and PW 3 were able to see the robbers. PW 2 and PW 3 then went i nto hiding in the banana plantation near the house. One Kityo, shot by the robbers, was subsequently admitted in Mulago Hospital casualty ward. During the same night the appellant was found lying down on the compound of someone near the scene of the robbe r y. The appellant had bullet wounds on the arm and in the chest. When No. 28416 D/C Charles Kemba, (PW5) asked him if he knew how he had sustained the injuries, he explained that his fellow robbers had shot him. PW5 took him to Mulago Hospital: When PW2 an d PW 3 went to visit one Kityo at the Hospital they found that the appellant had also been admitted in the same ward. Both witnesses saw and recognized the appellant as one of those who had robbed them. On 16/11/1999, W/D/IP Balidawa Margaret (PW 4) record e d a charge and caution statement from the appellant. In the statement, the appellant admitted participation in the robbery, but during the trial he retracted and repudiated his confession. After holding a trial within a trial, the judge admitted the confe ssion statement as having been made voluntary and as true. The statement was admitted as exhibit P.3. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb10\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 In his defence, the appellant denied participation in the offence. He said that he was shot by unknown people as he was returning to his brother's house. The learned trial judge rejected the appellant's defence, and believed the prosecution evidence, convicting the appellant as indicted. His appeal to the Court of Appeal was unsuccessful. Hence this appeal, based on two grounds, which are firstly, that t he learned Justices of Appeal erred in law and fact when they upheld a conviction based on an unsatisfactory confession, and secondly that the learned Justices of Appeal erred in law and fact when they failed to judicially evaluate the evidence on record thereby coming to a wrong decision. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb24\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 Mr. Noah Sekabojja learned counsel for the appellant said that he would argue both grounds of appeal together, but in essence his argument revolved only around the first ground. He contended that, the appellant's evidence in the trial within the trial sho w s that there was no confession in the real sense. That evidence shows that the appellant was illerate. He said that he was told to sign the statement before he could be taken for treatment. Policemen were not the ones guarding him at Mulago. He was a mech a nic but he had never gone to school. He gained experience on the job. He knew how to write his name although he had never gone to school. Learned counsel submitted that the confession was not made by the appellant because he did not know that it was a con fession. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb14\sl-494\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 Ms. Kagezi, State Attorney, supported the conviction. She submitted that there was no merit in the appellants' complaint against Court of Appeals upholding the finding that the confessions was corroborated by medical evidence. The wounds found on him amounted to such corroboration. The medical report was 10 days old, having been made on 17}{\cs23\fs22\super\insrsid5919264 th}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 November 1999. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb10\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 In our opinion, the learned Justices of Appeal made a thorough evaluation of the evidence of the circumstances of the appellant's confession and other evidence in the case as a whole and reached their own conclusion upholding the guilt of the appellant. Regarding the appellant's confession statement, the learned Justices of Appeal referred to the appellant's confession that he and his colleagu e s planned the robbery. They stopped PW 2 and PW 3 at the gate of their house and robbed them of the bag containing money. After the robbery someone arrested the appellant. Patrick shot at the person who had arrested the appellant and they had a struggle. I n the process the appellant was accidentally shot in the leg. He had to be carried by his fellow robbers. When his fellow robber, Kiwa, was tired of lifting him up, the other robber, Patrick, shot the appellant in the abdomen and was left for dead. The le arned trial judge found that the appellant's confession was true. Relying on the authority of }{\cs22\b\fs22\ul\insrsid5919264 Tuwamoui Vs Uganda (1962) EA. 84}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 the learned Justices of Appeal agreed with the learned trial judge that on the confession alone without corroboration, the appella nt could be convicted. The trial Court and the Court of Appeal found that the evidence of PW 2 and PW 3 corroborated the appellant's confession. We are unable to fault both courts in this regard. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb53\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 The learned Justices of Appeal also found that apart from th e aspect of the number of pistol/s that were used during the robbery and recognition of the appellant at the scene of crime, PW 2 and PW3's testimony corroborated the appellant's commission of the crime. Both witnesses testified that robbers who had a pis tol attacked them at their gate. When the pistol was fired the windscreen was smashed. The robbers demanded money at gunpoint and PW 3 surrendered her bag containing the money. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb14\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 The learned Justices of Appeal found further corroboration of the appellant's confession in the medical evidence by Dr. Taddeus Birungi, PW 1 and the medical report PE1. This evidence showed that the appellant had a fracture of the right leg, and was a larcerated wound on the abdomen. The wounds were about 10 days old. The medical report was made on the 17}{\cs23\fs22\super\insrsid5919264 th}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 November 1999, which was about twelve days after the robbery. The injuries described in the medical report tallied with what the appellant stated in his confession. The appellant stated that Patrick had accidentally shot him on t he leg. Subsequently because Kiwa was tired of carrying him, Patrick shot him in the abdomen leaving him for dead. The learned trial judge was therefore right to base the appellant's conviction on his confession, which was made voluntarily, true and was c orroborated. The learned Justices of Appeal, rightly so in our view upheld this finding. There was ample evidence to support his conviction. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri1099\sb53\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin1099\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 In the circumstances, the two grounds of appeal must fail and we find no merit in the appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb5\sl-490\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1721573 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 Regarding sentence, the appellant in this case, along with}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 appellants in other cases}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 listed for hearing in the same session, who had been sentenced to}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 death, filed supplementary grounds of appeal maintaining}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 that the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the death sentence as}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 mandatory. The supplementary ground was based on the decision}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 of the Constitutional Court No. 6 of 2003 in which it was held that the}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 law }{ \cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 rendering }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 death sentence mandatory was unconstitutional. We}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 heard full arguments of the supplementary ground in Criminal Appeal }{ \cs26\b\fs22\ul\insrsid5919264\charrsid1721573 No. 16 of 2004. Phillip}{\cs26\b\fs22\ul\insrsid1721573\charrsid1721573 }{\cs26\b\fs22\ul\insrsid5919264\charrsid1721573 Zahura Vs. Ugand}{\cs26\b\fs22\insrsid5919264\charrsid1721573 a}{ \cs26\b\fs28\insrsid5919264 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 and intimated that our holding thereon would}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 be applied to other appeals in which the sentence of death had been}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 } {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 imposed as a mandatory sentence. Accordingly we order as we did in the Philip Zahura case that in}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 exercise of our discretion under Article 22 (1) of the Constitution we}{ \cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 postponed confirmation of the sentence until disposal/determination}{\cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 of the Appeal against decision of the Constitutional Court in No. 6 of}{ \cs23\fs22\insrsid1721573 }{\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 2003, Constitutional Petition. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid5919264 \par \par \par }\pard \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sb86\widctlpar\tldot\tx2861\tldot\tx4056\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1721573 {\cs23\b\i\fs22\insrsid5919264\charrsid1721573 Dated at Mengo this 21st day of December 2005 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb86\widctlpar\tldot\tx2861\tldot\tx4056\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs23\fs22\insrsid5919264 \sect }\sectd \marglsxn1719\margrsxn1719\margtsxn2168\sbknone\linex0\colsx60\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s17\qr \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs24\fs22\insrsid5919264 PAGE}}{\fldrslt {\cs24\fs22\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid1721573 6}}}{ \cs24\fs22\insrsid5919264 \par }}\pard\plain \s16\ql \li0\ri0\sb53\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par \par }\pard \s16\qc \li0\ri0\sb53\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid1721573 {\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 A. H. O. ODER}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par \par J. }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 W. N. TSEKOKO,}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par \par \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 A. N. KAROKORA,}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 J. N. MULENGA,}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 G. W. KANYEIHAMBA,}{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid1721573 \par }{\cs22\b\fs22\insrsid5919264 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT. \par }}