Okello v Republic [2022] KECA 1251 (KLR) | Sentencing Discretion | Esheria

Okello v Republic [2022] KECA 1251 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Okello v Republic (Criminal Appeal 149 of 2018) [2022] KECA 1251 (KLR) (10 November 2022) (Judgment)

Neutral citation: [2022] KECA 1251 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Court of Appeal at Kisumu

Criminal Appeal 149 of 2018

PO Kiage, F Tuiyott & JM Ngugi, JJA

November 10, 2022

Between

Luka Okello

Appellant

and

Republic

Respondent

(Being an Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Migori, (Mrima, J.) dated 23rd February, 2017 in HCCRA No. 26 of 2016)

Judgment

1. The appellant abandons his appeal on conviction and focuses on the sentence. He asks us to consider recent jurisprudence from the High Court and from this court, in which it has become quite clear that courts retain discretion to deal with sentence in matters under the Sexual Offences Act, notwithstanding the minimum mandatory sentences, which have been questioned and found unconstitutional.

2. Miss Odumba, learned prosecuting counsel does not object to the withdrawal of the appellant’s appeal on conviction, she goes on to state that given the circumstances of this case, the state proposes that the sentence imposed upon the appellant should be reduced from 20 years to eight (8) years.

3. Having considered the submissions made before us, our decision in this matter, is that the appeal on sentence succeeds and the appellant’s sentence is reduced to the time already served.

4. In the result, the appellant shall be immediately set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. The full reasons for this judgment shall be rendered on the March 17, 2023. Order accordingly.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISII THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022P.O. KIAGE...................................JUDGE OF APPEALF. TUIYOTT....................................JUDGE OF APPEALJOEL NGUGI...................................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.DEPUTY REGISTRAR