Patric Handa v Rai Plywoods (K) Ltd [2017] KEELRC 1974 (KLR) | Reinstatement Of Dismissed Claim | Esheria

Patric Handa v Rai Plywoods (K) Ltd [2017] KEELRC 1974 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT ELDORET

CAUSE NO. 20 OF 2017

(Originally Nakuru Cause No. 172 of 2014)

PATRIC HANDA                                                   CLAIMANT

v

RAI PLYWOODS (K) LTD                             RESPONDENT

RULING

1. Patrick Handa (applicant) instituted proceedings against Rai Plywoods (K) Ltd (Respondent) on 26 May 2014 alleging breach of contract/unfair termination of employment.

2. The Respondent filed a Response on 18 December 2014.

3. On 16 July 2014, the Court scheduled the hearing for 17 March 2015 in the presence of Ms. Wanjiru holding brief for Mr. Kipkoech.

4. When the Cause was called out for hearing on 17 March 2015, the Claimant sought an adjournment on the basis that counsel on record was attending the High Court in Eldoret.

5. The Court granted the adjournment and directed that the Claimant pay court adjournment fees.

6. On 4 February 2016, the Claimant secured a mention date in the registry for a mention on 19 July 2016.

7. However, the Claimant did not attend Court and the Court directed that the Cause be stood over generally. The Claimant was directed to pay court adjournment fees.

8. Again, on 28 July 2016, the Claimant applied to the Registry for a mention date. The Registry scheduled mention for 27 October 2016.

9. None of the parties attended Court on 27 October 2016 and the Court stood over the Cause with an order that the Claimant pays court adjournment fees for the day and the fees ordered previously (the Claimant had not paid the adjournment fees directed on 19 July 2016).

10. On 21 November 2016, the Claimant yet again moved the Registry to schedule the Cause for mention and the Registry scheduled mention for 1 March 2017.

11. On 1 March 2017 the Court directed that Agreed Issues be filed before 31 March 2017 and mention to confirm was fixed for 10 April 2017, during which the Issues as proposed by the Claimant were adopted.

12. At the same appearance, the Court ordered that the Cause be transferred to Eldoret for hearing on 26 June 2017. The Claimant was directed to serve a hearing notice upon the Respondent.

13. The Court did not sit on 26 June 2016 as it was declared a public holiday and the Deputy Registrar caused a notice to be posted in the notice board that the Cause would be heard on 24 July 2017.

14. When the Cause was called out on 24 July 2017, none of the parties were represented and the Court dismissed the Cause.

15. The Claimant has now moved Court through a motion dated 3 August 2017 seeking

1. THAT this Honourable Court be and is hereby pleased to review and/or set aside the orders made by this Court on 24/7/2017 dismissing the Applicant’s/Claimant’s claim for non-attendance.

2. THATthis Honourable Court be pleased to reinstate the Applicant’s/Claimant’s claim and set the same down for hearing at the earliest opportune time.

3. THAT cost of this application be in the cause.

16. The Respondent indicated that it would not oppose the application.

17. The applicant has asserted that he did not see the public notice by the Deputy Registrar rescheduling the Causes which were caught up by the public holiday to 24 July 2017 because his advocate’s offices are located in Nakuru and not Eldoret.

18. The orders sought by the applicant require the Court to exercise its discretion and the legal principles applicable to such exercise of discretion have been set out in many decisions which the Court need not recite.

19. In the view of the Court, the applicant has not exhibited diligence in having the Cause determined as shown by the failure to attend Court during various appearances.

20. However, and because the Respondent does not oppose the application, the Court will allow the application with no order as to costs.

Delivered, dated and signed in Eldoret on this 29th day of September 2017.

Radido Stephen

Judge

Appearances

For applicant                              Mr. Nanda instructed by Gordon Ogola, Kipkoech & Co. Advocates

For Respondent                          Mr. Aseso instructed by Gicheru & Co. Advocates

Court Assistants                          Nixon/Etyang