Peter Muriithi Gichohi v Richard Wambugu Gichohi [2017] KEELC 1230 (KLR) | Enforcement Of Judgment | Esheria

Peter Muriithi Gichohi v Richard Wambugu Gichohi [2017] KEELC 1230 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND  COURT

AT NYERI

ELC  CASE NO. 105 OF 2014

PETER MURIITHI GICHOHI ......................... PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT

-VERSUS-

RICHARD WAMBUGU GICHOHI ..... DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT

RULING

1. The notice of motion dated 3rd March, 2017 seeks to enforce the judgment of this court delivered on 26th April, 2016. Vide that judgment, this court allowed the applicant’s suit and issued an order compelling the defendant to surrender the title deed forDaiga/ Umande/Block 2/2139(hereinafter referred to as the suit property) to the Land Registrar Laikipia for cancellation.

2.  The motion is premised on the ground that since the respondent has failed, refused and/or ignored to execute the decree despite many requests by the applicant, this court should grant him the following orders:

(a) That the Deputy Regsitrar of this Honourable Court be authorised to execute all documents requisite to effectuate the transfer of the parcel of land L.R. No. Daiga/Umande Block 2/2139 in favour of the applicant.

(b) That the Land Regitrar, Laikipia Country, be directed to dispense with the production of the title deed to the parcel of Land L. R. Daiga/Umande Block 2/2139 to effectuate the decree herein.

(c) That costs be provided for.

3. The application is opposed. In his replying affidavit sworn on 22nd March 2017, the 1st respondent

Richard Joe Wambugu deposes that on 19th September, 2016 he filed an appeal No. 54 of 2016 against the judgement. It is his contention that if the orders sought are granted, his appeal will be rendered nugatory. He prays that execution of the decree be stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

4. When the matter came up for hearing on 23rd May 2017, the applicant chose to rely on the grounds on the face of his application and his supporting affidavit sworn on 3rd March, 2017.

5. The respondent also relied on his replying affidavit sworn on 22nd March, 2017 and on the annexutres, for example, certified copies of proceedings  and Judgment supplied to him on 23rd August, 2016.  Upon perusal of the court record, I also came across a certificate of delay by the Deputy Registrar and a Memoramdum of Appeal.

6. I have considered affidavits and evidence tendered.  In the circumstances of this case, i find it necessary to stay the Judgment of this court delivered on 26th April, 2016 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal as failure to do so may render the appeal nugatory if the 1st respondent is successful.

7. For the reasons given, l decline to allow the application and order that execution be stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Dated, Signed and Delivered in open court at Nyeri this 17th day of October, 2017.

L N WAITHAKA

JUDGE

In the presence of:

N/A by applicant

N/A by respondent

Court assisant - Esther