Peter O. Ngoge t/a O.P. Ngoge & Associates v Ammu Investment Co. Ltd [2012] KEHC 1887 (KLR)

Editorial Summary

1. Court Vacation

2. Civil case

3. Application for temporary injunction.

4. Subject of main suit

LAND LR 72/233

4. 1           That construction be stopped pendhearing of Notice of Motion of13th August2012

5. Held:Injunction to issue for 14 days.

6. Case Law:

7. Advocates:

i)        J.K. Jakaiwa holding brief for C.B. Mwongela instructed byM/s C.B. Mwongela & Co Advocates for plaintiff

ii)       T. Mugambi holding brief for Otieno Ombati instructed byM/s Ombati Otieno & Co Advocates for respondent

PETER O. NGOGE T/A O.P. NGOGE & ASSOCIATES ……….....………..….… APPLICANT

VERSUS

AMMU INVESTMENT CO. LT ……..............………...........…..............… RESPONDENT/CLIENT

R U L I N G

IINTRODUCTION

1. The applicants 1 – 6 have filed suit seeking orders that an injunction do issue restraining the defendants from constructing on block 72/233 Ngei Phase II Estate Langata.

2. Upon hearing the parties on the issue as to whether a temporary injunction should issue or not. And upon giving the date of

29th August 2012 for interparte hearing. I hereby find that the injunctive order do issue against the defendants from further constructing for 14 days under Order 40 r 4(2) Civil Procedure Rules and upon the interparte hearing of this matter.

3. The costs be in the cause.

DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012 AT NAIROBI

M.A. ANG’AWA

JUDGE

Advocates:

i)  J.K. Jakaiwa holding brief for C.B. Mwongela instructed byM/s C.B. Mwongela  & Co Advocates for plaintiff

ii)  T. Mugambi holding brief for Otieno Ombati instructed byM/s Ombati Otieno & Co Advocates for respondent