Rael Muyaka,Helina Nasimiyu,Wasike Murambochi,David Sicharani,Dickson Sabuni,Florence Namalwa & Thomas Shikuku v Waitaluk Land Disputes Tribunal Comprising of Mboto Kidai,Harun Kipsugut & Ezekiel Kessio [2006] KECA 97 (KLR) | Record Of Appeal Requirements | Esheria

Rael Muyaka,Helina Nasimiyu,Wasike Murambochi,David Sicharani,Dickson Sabuni,Florence Namalwa & Thomas Shikuku v Waitaluk Land Disputes Tribunal Comprising of Mboto Kidai,Harun Kipsugut & Ezekiel Kessio [2006] KECA 97 (KLR)

Full Case Text

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA

AT ELDORET

CIVIL APPEAL 354 OF 2002

RAEL MUYAKA

HELINA NASIMIYU

WASIKE MURAMBOCHI

DAVID SICHARANI

DICKSON SABUNI

FLORENCE NAMALWA

THOMAS SHIKUKU ………………….........................................………..…APPELLANTS

VERSUS

WAITALUK LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL COMPRISONG OF

MBOTO KIDAI

HARUN KIPSUGUT

EZEKIEL KESSIO …………….......................................…………………RESPONDENTS

(Appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Kitale (Etyang J) dated 18th December, 2001

in

MISC. APPL. NO. 102 OF 2001

**************************

ORDER OF THE COURT

This is an appeal from the Ruling of the superior court (Etyang J) in Kitale Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 102 of 2001 delivered at Kitale on 18th December, 2001.  In that ruling, the superior court dismissed the Appellants’ Amended Notice of Motion filed on 3rd October 2001.  The parties appeared before us on 20th September 2006 and argued the appeal at length.  We then reserved our judgment on the same and directed that it be delivered today 13th October 2006.

In the process of preparing the judgment, we perused carefully the record of appeal before us, and have noted to our dismay that the Amended Notice of Motion which was considered by the superior court and upon which the Ruling was based was not included in the record of appeal before us as is required by Rule 85 (1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.  The amended Notice of Motion is a primary document and had to be included as part of the record of appeal.  In the circumstances, we cannot deliver judgment in this matter as in law there is no valid appeal before us upon which a judgment can be given.  Its omission is fatal to the entire appeal which regrettably must be struck out.

This appeal stands struck out.  We make no orders as to the costs.  These are the orders of the Court.

Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 13th day of October, 2006.

R. S. C. OMOLO

……………………………

JUDGE OF APPEAL

J. W. ONYANGO OTIENO

……………………………

JUDGE OF APPEAL

W. S. DEVERELL

……………………………

JUDGE OF APPEAL

I certify that this is a true copy of the original.

DEPUTY REGISTRAR