Reamaton Ltd v Uganda Corporation Creameries Ltd (Civil Application No. 53 of 1997) [1998] UGCA 23 (1 July 1998)

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f171\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f172\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f174\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f175\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f176\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f177\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f178\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f179\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{ \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid7413221 Normal (Web);}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 \styrsid10116514 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid10116514 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid12292\rsid147964\rsid263824\rsid483953\rsid532800\rsid542833\rsid656068\rsid813077\rsid853000\rsid1212221\rsid1263153\rsid1328200\rsid1589256 \rsid1597739\rsid1769736\rsid1979034\rsid1985355\rsid2651407\rsid2753621\rsid2833257\rsid2891500\rsid3035935\rsid3163095\rsid3436095\rsid3891542\rsid4004402\rsid4013346\rsid4081474\rsid4146905\rsid4154319\rsid4606034\rsid4615111\rsid4804988\rsid4812412 \rsid4816222\rsid4994645\rsid5133152\rsid5249105\rsid5257113\rsid5338672\rsid5393925\rsid5510309\rsid5529574\rsid5578182\rsid5599792\rsid5925591\rsid6168920\rsid6227913\rsid6298534\rsid6761646\rsid6774612\rsid7235957\rsid7297041\rsid7413221\rsid7555992 \rsid7699176\rsid7878088\rsid8001677\rsid8538801\rsid8545157\rsid8587579\rsid8857076\rsid8875848\rsid9138396\rsid9583136\rsid9729420\rsid9857326\rsid9908807\rsid10116514\rsid10119127\rsid10167632\rsid10384870\rsid10438333\rsid10438669\rsid10517635 \rsid10564061\rsid10569595\rsid10693564\rsid10703749\rsid10825639\rsid10975670\rsid11025202\rsid11078177\rsid11350863\rsid11555040\rsid11563786\rsid11930287\rsid12526284\rsid12718503\rsid12742138\rsid13255604\rsid13435762\rsid13466614\rsid13512610 \rsid13704567\rsid13720995\rsid13914955\rsid14043846\rsid14428627\rsid14626845\rsid14839716\rsid14942689\rsid15430543\rsid15613728\rsid15688051\rsid15798275\rsid15818385\rsid15867524\rsid15882927\rsid15952220\rsid16061834\rsid16084859\rsid16150457 \rsid16258179\rsid16265927\rsid16321832\rsid16581033\rsid16604061\rsid16673595}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA }{\author Wor. Jessica chemeri}{\operator cguest}{\creatim\yr2008\mo9\dy11\hr12\min15} {\revtim\yr2008\mo9\dy16\hr10\min32}{\version4}{\edmins76}{\nofpages4}{\nofwords1112}{\nofchars6342}{\nofcharsws7440}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin \dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot7413221\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10116514 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10116514 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10116514 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10116514 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid8587579\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid813077 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs17\insrsid10116514 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs17\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid16258179 1}}}{\cs17\insrsid10116514 \par }\pard \s16\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid10116514 {\insrsid10116514 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1 \widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid15613728 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid9857326 }{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid9857326 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{ \ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line }{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid9857326 IN THE}{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 COURT OF APPEAL OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA }{\ul\insrsid9857326 \par }{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line CORAM: }{\ul\insrsid9857326 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 HON. MR. JUSTICE S. T. MANYINDO, DCJ \line }{\insrsid9857326 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 HON. MR. JUSTICE C. M. KATO, J. A. \line }{\insrsid9857326 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 HON. MR. JUSTICE G. M. OKELLO, J. A.}{\insrsid9857326 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line }{\insrsid9857326 }{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 CIVIL APPLICATION 53/97 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line REAMATON }{\insrsid9857326\charrsid15613728 LTD:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line }{\insrsid9857326 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 - VERSUS - \line }{\insrsid9857326 UGANDA CO RPORATION CREAMERIES }{\insrsid9857326\charrsid15613728 LTD}{\insrsid9857326 ::::::::::::::::::::}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 1ST RESPONDENT \line HENRY KAWALYA}{\insrsid9857326 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::}{ \insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 2ND RESPONDENT}{\insrsid9857326 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line }{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 RULING OF THE COURT: }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line This is an application for striking out the respondent\rquote s notice of appeal lodged in the High Court on 30/7/97. The application was filed under Rules 42(2), 43(1) and 81 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1996. The application is supported by the affi davit of Mr. Blaze Babigumira, counsel for the applicant, dated 24/11/97. On 18/5/98 Mr. Ebert Byenkya, one of the lawyers for the respondents, also swore and filed an affidavit in reply to that sworn by Mr. Babigumira.}{\insrsid9857326 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 The brief facts leading to this application are as follows. The applicant, Reamatom Ltd. filed a suit in the High Court against the two respondents. Judgment was entered in the applicant\rquote s }{ \insrsid9857326\charrsid15613728 favor}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 on }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid16258179 29/7/97. On 30/7/97}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 the counsel for the respondents filed a notice of appeal against the said judgment}{ \insrsid9857326\charrsid15613728 .}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 By their letter of 29/7/97 the }{\insrsid9857326 respondents applied for a copy of }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 the record of the proceedings. After the expiration of the statutory period of 60 days within which the respondents should have lodged their appeal the applicant filed this a pplication for striking out the notice of appeal on the ground that the intended appeal had not been filed. \line When the application came up for hearing Mr. Babigumira the learned counsel for the applicant strongly argued that failure by the respondents to se rve his client with a letter requesting for the record of the proceedings under Rule 82(3) of Court of Appeal Rules, 1996 was fatal to the intended appeal. He contended that the respondents cannot rely on the provisions of Rule 82(2) which can only be inv oked after the appellant has complied with the requirement of Rule 82(3) which requires the appellant to serve the respondent with a copy of the letter requesting for the record of the proceedings in the lower court. Mr. Babigumira relied on the case of: }{\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 Kasirye Byaruhanga & Co. Advocates v Uganda Development Bank (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No.2/97), }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 where the Supreme Court}{\insrsid4146905 h}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 e1d t }{\insrsid4146905 hat an appellant cannot rely on }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 the said rule unless a copy of the letter requesting for the record of the proceedings was served on the respondent.}{\insrsid4146905 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 On the other hand Mr. Kihika who appeared for the respondents opposed the application on the ground that the applicant had in fact been served with a copy of the letter. He relied on the affidavit of John Simon Obongo dated 2/3/98. He fu rther argued that Rule 82(3) being a remedial provision should be interpreted liberally. In the}{\insrsid4146905 alternative he requested the }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 court to extend time in }{\insrsid4146905\charrsid15613728 favor}{ \insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 of his client under Rule 52(3) (d) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1996.}{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 Rule 81 under which the application was lodged reads as follows: \line \'93 A person on whom a notice of appeal has been served may at any time, either before or after the institution of the appeal, apply to the Court to strike out the notice or the appeal as the case may be, on the groun d that no appeal lies or that some essential step in the proceedings has not been taken or has not been taken within the prescribed time.\'94}{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 In the instant case the applicant based his application on the last part of the rule, namely that the respondents di d not take an essential step in the proceedings within the prescribed time. The learned counsel for the }{\insrsid15867524\charrsid15613728 applicant}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 argued that he was never served with any letter requesting for the record of the proceedings from the High Court to facilitate the intended appeal. He furthe}{\insrsid15867524 r }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 submitted that the last date for filing the appeal was 30/9/97 but to-date no appeal had been filed.}{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line We agree with Mr. Babigumira\rquote s contention that no appeal was filed within the prescribed time and that his client was never served with t he letter requesting for the proceedings of the court below. Mr. Kihika\rquote s argument that an affidavit of service was enough cannot be sustained in view of the clear provisions of Rule 82(3) which requires the appellant to retain proof of service; in this case there was no evidence that the respondents had retained such proof. The required proof would have been by a copy of the letter bearing an }{\insrsid15867524\charrsid15613728 endorsement}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 and stamp of the applicant\rquote s firm of advocates or a statement in the affidavit of service showing that the applicant\rquote s counsel had declined to accept service or to stamp the copy of the letter. }{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 Strangely, a copy of the purported letter was not even filed in this court to support Mr. Kihika\rquote s argument that the applicant\rquote s counsel had been served with a copy of the letter. Mr. Kihika\rquote s request that the provisions of Rule 82(3) should be interpreted liberally so that an affidavit sworn by Mr. Obongo may be regarded as good evidence of s ervice cannot be maintained in the present case because that affidavit does not explain why only notice of the appeal was stamped but not the letter. The reason as to why the letter was not stamped may be that it was never served upon the applicant \rquote s counsel at all. In these circumstances the respondents cannot rely on the provisions of Rule 82(2) of the Rules of this court.}{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line }{\insrsid15867524 We }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 now turn to the alternative }{\insrsid15867524\charrsid15613728 submission}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 by Mr. Kihika which was that the court should extend time within which he may lodge the appeal under Rule 52(2)(d). Mr. Kihika conceded that he had no authority to support his proposition that court can extend time when dealing with an application to strike out a notice of appeal.}{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \line To appreciate the correct position of the law on this point we find it necessary to reproduce the provisions of Rule 52(2) of Cour}{\insrsid15867524 t of Appeal Rules. It reads: \line }{ \insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 \'9352. (1) Every application, other than an application included in }{\insrsid15867524\charrsid15613728 sub rule}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 (2) shall be heard by a single Judge of the Court, except that any such application may be adjourned by the Judge for determination by the Court. \line (2) This rule shall not apply- \line (a) to an applicati}{\insrsid15867524 on for leave to appeal, or for }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 a certificat}{\insrsid15867524 e that a question or questions }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 of }{\insrsid15867524 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 great public or general importance arise; \line }{\insrsid15867524 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 or \line (b) to an application for a stay of execution, injunction or stay of proceedings; or \line (c) to an application to strike out a notice of appeal or an appeal; or \line (d) to an application made as ancillary to an application under paragraph (a) or (b) or made informally in the cours e of hearing, including an application for leave or to extend time if the proceedings are found to be deficient in the matters in the course of the hearing.\'94}{\insrsid15867524 \par }{\insrsid16258179 }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 The above provision makes it crystal clear that Rule 52(2}{\insrsid16258179\charrsid15613728 ) (}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 d) is not applicable to applications f or striking out notices of appeal as indicated in Rule 52(2}{\insrsid16258179\charrsid15613728 ) (}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 d) itself. Clearly under Rule 52(2) (c) above an applica}{\insrsid16258179 tion for extension of time lies before a single judge only. We}{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 find no merit in the alternative submission of Mr. Kihika.}{\insrsid16258179 \par }{\insrsid7413221\charrsid15613728 In the result we allow the application and strike out the notice of appeal. The respondents shall pay the applicant the costs of this application.}{\insrsid16258179 \par Dated at Kampala this 1}{\super\insrsid16258179\charrsid16258179 st}{\insrsid16258179 day of July 1998 \par }{\b\insrsid16258179\charrsid16258179 S. T. MANYINDO \par }{\b\ul\insrsid16258179\charrsid16258179 DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE \par C. M. KATO \par JUSTICE OF APPEAL \par G. M. OKELLO \par JUSTICE OF APPEAL}{\b\ul\insrsid7413221\charrsid16258179 \par }}