Republic v Bernard Langat [2018] KEHC 361 (KLR) | Jurisdiction Of Magistrates | Esheria

Republic v Bernard Langat [2018] KEHC 361 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAROK

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 46 OF 2018

REPUBLIC...........................APPLICANT

-VERSUS-

BERNARD LANGAT ......RESPONDENT

(Being Revision of the Order of the Resident Magistrate dated 5th March, 2018 in the Chief Magistrate Court at Narok, in Criminal Case No. 300 of 2018, Republic V. Bernard Langat).

ORDER ON REVISION

1. This matter has been reported by the Chief Magistrate (Hon. W.A. Juma) for orders in respect of the order of the learned Resident Magistrate (Hon. A.N. Sisenda) in which she convicted the respondent on his own plea of guilty for being drunk and disorderly contrary to Section 33 (i) (ii) of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act No. 4 of 2010.  She then proceeded to sentence the respondent  to a fine of shs.30,000/= in default  to serve 6 months imprisonment.

2. In her report to this court the Chief Magistrate has indicated that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain and determine this matter.  In this regard, the definition of “magistrate” in the interpretation section of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act in section 2 means “A magistrate who is above the rank of the Resident Magistrate.”

3. It therefore follows that Hon. Sisenda who holds the rank of Resident Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to entertain and determine this matter.

4. It also follows that the order made by the learned resident magistrate is null and void.

5. In the circumstances both the conviction and sentence are hereby quashed.

6. If the fine was paid, it should be refunded.

7. Orders accordingly.

Order in revision dated this 7th  day of December, 2018

J.M. BWONWONGA

JUDGE

7/12/2018