Republic v Boniface Kiogora,Jameleck Kaburu Mugira & Benard Murianki Mbaya [2016] KEHC 5143 (KLR) | Bail And Bond | Esheria

Republic v Boniface Kiogora,Jameleck Kaburu Mugira & Benard Murianki Mbaya [2016] KEHC 5143 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MERU

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 83 OF 2015

REPUBLIC ………………………............………….…. PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

BONIFACE KIOGORA …………………….…….….....1ST ACCUSED

JAMELECK KABURU MUGIRA.................................2ND ACCUSED

BENARD MURIANKI MBAYA.....................................3RD ACCUSED

RULING

The three accused, Boniface Kiogora, Jameleck Kaburu MugiraandBenard Murianki Mbaya, face a charge of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code CAP 63 of the Laws of Kenya.   They have filed the Notice of Motion dated 24/2/2016 seeking to be released on bond pending the hearing of this case.  Each of them swore an affidavit in support of the application.  The grounds upon which the application is brought are that the accused have an unqualified right to bond on reasonable grounds, pursuant to Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution; that the offence is bailable and they are ready to comply with whatever terms the court will grant; that they are Kenyan citizens from Meru where they have their residences and are not a flight risk.

The Investigation Officer filed a replying affidavit in which he depones that after the commission of the offence, the accused went into hiding and were arrested after 4 days and are therefore, a flight risk.  The accused persons filed a further affidavit denying the allegation and stating that they were at their homes from where they were arrested.

The primary consideration in an application for bond is whether an accused will turn up for his trial.  In this case, the court called for prebail reports which were favourable to all the accused.  They are said to be of good character – all have not been involved in any criminality before.  They are also said to have families in Meru who are willing to provide security for the accused and are therefore not a flight risk.

Although the Investigation Officer states that the accused had gone into hiding, there is no evidence made by the Police to arrest the accused after the 4 days.  In my considered view, there are no compelling reasons to warrant the acused being denied bond.

In the end, I allow the application and grant accused persons bond as follows:

Each accused may be released on bond of KShs.250,000/= plus one surety of like sum or in the alternative, cash bail of KShs.75,000/= each.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY, 2016.

R.P.V. WENDOH

JUDGE

11/5/2015

PRESENT

Mr. Mulochi for State

Mr. Munene Kiumi  Holding Brief  for Mr. Mutegi for Accused

Ibrahim/Peninah, Court Assistants

All Present, Accused