The court held that the ex-parte applicant's application for judicial review was premature and incompetent because it was filed before the adoption of the Land Disputes Tribunal's award by the magistrate's court. The proper procedure required either an appeal to the Appeals Committee under Section 8 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act or, alternatively, seeking judicial review only after the magistrate's court had adopted the tribunal's award. Since neither of these procedural steps had occurred, the application was struck out on technical grounds without consideration of the substantive merits of the complaints regarding jurisdiction or locus standi.