Republic v Chairman Ndivisi Disputes Land Tribunal & Martin Juma Ex-parte Jack Wanyama Mangoli & Trudea Naswa [2013] KEHC 5895 (KLR) | Judicial Review | Esheria

Republic v Chairman Ndivisi Disputes Land Tribunal & Martin Juma Ex-parte Jack Wanyama Mangoli & Trudea Naswa [2013] KEHC 5895 (KLR)

Full Case Text

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA

MISC. APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2010.

IN THE MATTER  OF AN  APPLICATION BY MARTIN JUMA AND JACK WANYAMA MANGOLI

FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

AND

IN THE MATTER  OF THE LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3 0F 2009 AND WEBUYE SENIOR RESIDENTS MAGISTRATES COURT LAND CASE NO. 16 OF 2009

AND  ADOPTION ORDER THEREIN ISSUES ON 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009

AND

IN THE MATTER  OF THE LAND  REFORM ACT CHAPTER 26 LAWS OF  KENYA

BETWEEN

REPUBLIC …............................................................................................. APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE CHAIRMAN NDIVISI

LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ….............................................................. RESPONDENT

MARTIN JUMA

JACK WANYAMA MANGOLI …..................................................... EXPARTE APPLICANT

TRUDEA NASWA......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY

JUDGMENT

The exparte  applicants by notice of motion dated 17th  May 2012 sought orders;

That the decision of Ndivisi land Disputes tribunal case no. 3 of 2009 over L.R.  No. Ndivisi/Makuselwa/1451 and 1634 and the judgment and orders of  the SRMC Webuye in Misc. application no. 16  of 2009 dated 4th September 2009 be removed into this court, reviewed  and quashed.

That  Ndivisi division land disputes tribunal be prohibited from arbitrating a claim lodged by the complainant directly or indirectly over the same parcel of land again.

Costs of this application be provided for.

The applicant was granted  leave to commence judicial review proceedings on 7th May 2012.

The proceedings before the Ndivisi Land Disputes  tribunal reveal the complaint was about sharing the estate of deceased Mangoli Wachie.  The  interested party was the sister to the expartge applicants.  The  land in question was their father's.  Their father had 5 wives and the interested\ party was from the first  house as an only child.

From the verdict of the tribunal it seemed the land had been transferred  to martin Juma's name from his father.  The tribunal  stated  thus in their verdict;

“Mrs. Trudea  Naswa Mukhevi the complainant has the right to get a share of two (2) acres of land from her  father's land of  47 acres which is   a share  of her mother, this to come from the two numbers in MARTIN JUMA'S name i.e. ND/MK/1451 & 1634. ”

The exparte applicants submit this matter was  beyond the jurisdiction  of the Tribunal.  Mr. omukunda submitted  that the two parcels  do not  exist  as the land ND/MK/816  is registered in the names of GILBERT WACHIE MANGOLI – deceased. However, this may not be true as  the search referred to and annexed  in the replying affidavit of the interested party clearly  shows L.R. 816 was closed on subdivision on  19th March 2004 to give  a  new number 1449 – 1461.

Mr. Omukunda  also submitted  the tribunal had no business dealing with matters of succession.

The interested party on her part  said her Father had given her two(2) acres and Martin has refused  to  give her the two acres.  She said the  exparte applicants  had  lied they would give her land.

It is unfortunate the  exparte applicants  have disinherited the interested party of her small  share of two acres from her father's land.  She ought to have filed her claim in the high court to establish her claim.  The tribunal  does not have capacity to make an order that   results into cancellation of applicants titles.  They exceeded  the powers given to  them by Section 3 (1) of the land Disputes tribunal Act.

Their award which was  adopted by Webuye SRMCC No. 16 of 2009 on the 4th September 2009 is called into this court and is hereby  quashed.

There is a second prayer seeking  an order prohibiting the Ndivisi Land disputes tribunal from hearing  this matter again.  This  is overtaken as the tribunal has since been disbanded.

I order that each party bear their own costs.

JUDGMENT DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED In open court this 12th day of June 2013.

A. OMOLLO

JUDGE