Republic v Farah Muse Eskel [2016] KEHC 3346 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 19 OF 2013

REPUBLIC..................................APPLICANT

VERSUS

FARAH MUSE ESKEL..................................................ACCUSED

R U L I N G

Having considered the evidence on record, and bearing in mind that at this stage the prosecution is merely required to establish a prima facie case against the accused, I find that the accused has a case to answer.

I thus put the accused on his defence. I consequently proceed to explain to the accused the three options available to him in his defence under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 75).

Dated and delivered at Garissa this 30th day of August 2016

GEORGE DULU

JUDGE