Republic v Jonathan Kipruto Kimayo [2017] KEHC 7419 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 49 OF 2014

REPUBLIC......................................................PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

JONATHAN KIPRUTO KIMAYO........................ACCUSSED

JUDGMENT

The accused herein was charged with the offence ofMurder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.The particulars of the offence were that on the 11th day of October 2014 at  Top Suwerwa Sub Location Cherengany within Trans Nzoia County  murdered  Rosemary  Jebet Kimaiyo.

The accused denied the offence and the prosecution called several witneses to prove its case.  Their evidence can be summarised as hereunder;

PW1 Mercy Chemutai is the deceased daughter.  She testified that on the material day11/10/2014  at around  10. 30 am  she was from grazing  cattle with one Marko Apolonyi when the accused came asking for the deceased.  By then the deceased had  come from the  farm and the accused arrived with a panga and attacked the deceased.  She tried to run but fell down.  The accused  proceeded to cut her all over the body.  The said witness screamed while running away and  despite being chased by the accused she managed to escape.  The neighbours then came to the scene but  unfortunately the deceased  had sustained serious cut injuries and she bled to death.   PW1 and the accused are cousins.

PW2 Marko Apolonyi Abalgamora an elderly witness testified that he was herding cattle on that material day together with PW1.

As PW1 left to get tea leaves  she heard her scream and she saw the accused run towards the  deceased and she heard her scream also. When he reached where she was  he saw the accused cutting her all over.  On cross-examination he testified that although  there was maize all around he could still see the accused assaulting the deceased.

PW3 Edwin Suter Kiprotich the Chief Kiptoror  location  received  a phone call from one Charles Kibor concerning the incident.

He called the OCS Cherangany who sent police officers to the scene where  they  found the body in a pool of blood and took it to the mortuary.  On  12/10/2014 the accused surrendered himself at the police station.  He also showed then where he had hidden the panga.

PW4 Dr Godfrey Obara Wamukoya produced the post mortem  form on behalf of Dr Edward Odhiambo  who after carrying  out the exercise concluded that the deceased  had died as a result of severe head injury with severe haemorage from the cut  wounds.

PW5 PC Kimeli Kipkemboi Nicholas testified  that after receiving a call at around  10. 00 am on 11/10/2014 he went to  the scene together with the area chief.  They found the body lying 20 metres  from the homestead and blood was still oozing from the head. It had other multiple cut injuries. They then took the body to Kitale Mortuary. They later received a report from OCS Kapcherop that the  accused had surrendered himself .  Upon interrogation he told them where the panga was and they   went to Kiptoror river where they recovered. He produced the panga as an exhibit.

When put on his defence  the accused gave unsworn evidence . He said   that on 11/10/2014 he was from Kibigos at around 5 pm where he had gone to work.  He met some people on a motorbike who inquired where he was as the members of the public were looking for him concerning the death of the deceased.  He became afraid and he  surrendered himself to the police. He  that he was shocked  concerning the deceased death.

Analysis and Determination

Having heard the parties herein and upon perusing the submissions by both  counsels for the  state and the accused  it is instructive  to note  that  that  the offence of Murder to be  proved one has to establish that there was malice aforethought pursuant to the  provisions of Section 206 of the Penal Code which states that;

“Malice aforethought shall be deemed to be established by evidence proving any one or more  of the following circumstances:

a) an intent to cause the death of or to do grievous harm to any person, whether that person is the person actually killed or not;

b) finding that the act or omission causing death will probably cause the death of or grievous harm to some person, whether that person is the person actually killed or  cut, although such knowledge is accompanied by indifference whether death or grievous bodily harm is caused or not, or by a wish that it may not be caused;

c) an intention to commit a felony;

d) an intention by the  act or omission to facilitate the flight or escape from custody of any person who  has committed or attempted to commit a felony.”

In the instant case the crucial evidence is that of PW1 and PW2. Both of them testified that  they were at the scene.  The incident took place at around 10 am. The accused was a cousin  to PW1 a fact which was not denied by the accused.  After assaulting the deceased he  managed to escape.  Her distress call attracted  the attention of the neighbours.

PW2 on the  other hand was present at the scene and he testified seeing the accused cutting the deceased.  The accused was a person well known to him.

The weapon used, panga, was recovered by PW3 after the accused disclosing where he had dropped.  This fact was never controverted even during cross-examination.  The doctors postmortem report confirmed that the cause of death was severe bleeding as a result of the deep cuts.

The defence by the accused boarders on alibi. The same however was not tested on cross-examination.  He did not infact explain himself where he was on the material day.

In the  premises I am fully persuaded that the accused  planned to kill the deceased.  Infact during cross-examination it emerged that the accused  believed that it was the deceased who had bewitched  her mother who had died before and thus he must have been on a revenge mission.

I do in the premises find that there was malice  afterthought as proved by the accused's action.  The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and I shall proceed to convict the accused with the offence of Murder as charged under the provisions of Section 203 of the Penal Code.

Delivered this  21st day of February, 2017.

_________________

H.K. CHEMITEI

JUDGE

In the presence of;

Kakoi for state

Accused - present

Kirong – Court Assistant