Republic v Musembi Mulei [2015] KEHC 1240 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT MOMBASA

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 53 OF 2013

REPUBLIC.....…....................................................….. PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

MUSEMBI MULEI  ........................................................…ACCUSED

JUDGMENT

MUSEMBI MULEI hereinafter referred to as the Accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.

The particulars are that:

“On the 23rd day of October, 2013 at about 8:30 m at Maweni Village Bura Ndogo area within Taita Taveta County he murdered Samuel Mwalili”.

he prosecution called eleven (11) Witnesses. The Accused gave a sworn statement.

Brief facts for the prosecution

Tobias Owuor Wandera (PW 2) operates a pool table at a place called Bura Ndogo.  On the 23rd day of October, 2013 at about 6:00 pm the Deceased and PW  1 Patrick Chula Maingo picked a quarrel while at  the pool table.  PW 1 told them to leave the premises.  After a period of close to  half an hour later, the Accused went to PW 2's joint and played pool table for about one hour and left.  Later  at about 8:30 pm they received information to the  effect that the  Deceased had been stabbed with a knife.

PW 6 ( Bernard Kanyi) did testify that he met the Accused on 23rd October, 2013 at about 9:00 pm and he told him that he had  killed somebody. He did not take him seriously.  The following day he received information that a  man had been killed in the neighborhood.  While in the company of one Musa (PW 6) they decided to go to the house of the Accused.  Upon  arrival and entering into the house, they searched and recovered a blood stained knife under the mattress. They  took the Accused  to Taveta police station.  PW 7 (Musa Ali) on 24th October, 2013 received information that the Accused had killed a man at a place where pool game was being played. They  proceeded to the house of the Accused and found a knife under his mattress. It smelled blood. They  took the Accused to police station together with the knife.

Chief Inspector Duncan Njau (PW8) received information that the Deceased was playing pool when he was stabbed.  He proceeded to the scene where he arrested Patrick (PW 1) who it was alleged had differed with the Deceased.  The following day members of public took the  Accused to the police station alleging that he had confessed to having killed the Deceased.  A knife was handed over to police but it was not blood stained.

This is a poorly investigated case.  If the scene of murder was  at a pool table and happened during hours of operation, there must have been eye Witnesses but none of the  prosecution Witnesses have mentioned having sen the Accused stab the Deceased. Th evidence before the Court is that the Deceased had disagreed with PW 1 and they had been ordered  to leave the premises which they both did.  The  Accused is  alleged to have gone to play pool table after the Deceased and PW 1 had left.

Evidence by PW 6 (Bernard Kanyi)  and PW 7 ( Musa Ali) appears to have been  relied on by police and charging the Accused.  PW 6 told the Court that its the Accused who told him that he had killed somebody. This was without  prompting from any quarter and after a casual meeting on a path.  PW 6 and PW 7 decided to go and confront the Accused, the following day even before reporting the matter to police.  They  allegedly  recovered a knife under a mattress from the house of the Accused.

PW 6  told the Court that the knife was blood stained.

PW7 testified that he recovered the knife under a mattress belonging to the Accused and that it was smelling blood.  He did not state that it was blood stained.

Chief Inspector Duncan Njau PW 8 received the knife from members public.  He told  the Court that the knife was not blood stained.

The evidence of the recovery  of the knife in the house of the Accused was primarily intended to link the Accused with the murder.

PW 6 and PW 7 have given contradictory evidence as to whether the knife was blood stained or not. The officers who received the knife  did not find or observe  any blood stains on it. There is nothing to show that this was the murder weapon.

Nobody saw the Accused stab the Deceased and there is no evidence to the effect that the two had met on the fateful night either at the pool table or elsewhere.

The prosecution has not proved this case beyond reasonable doubt. The Accused is found not guilty of the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code and he is acquitted accordingly under section 322 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

He is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.

Judgment delivered, dated and signed in open Court this 17th day of November,  2015.

…......................

M.  MUYA

JUDGE

17TH NOVEMBER, 2015

In the presence of:-

Learned   Counsel for the prosecution Miss Ogweno

Learned counsel for the defence Mr. Mushelle holding brief  Omari

Court Assistant Musundi

M.  MUYA – JUDGE

17/11/2015