REPUBLIC V PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF STATE FOR PROVINCIALADMINISTRATION AND INTERNAL SECURITY & 3 OTHERS EXPARTE ROSE WANGARIKINYUA & 2 OTHERS [2011] KEHC 87 (KLR) | Judicial Review Procedure | Esheria

REPUBLIC V PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF STATE FOR PROVINCIALADMINISTRATION AND INTERNAL SECURITY & 3 OTHERS EXPARTE ROSE WANGARIKINYUA & 2 OTHERS [2011] KEHC 87 (KLR)

Full Case Text

[if !mso]> <style> v\\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>

Normal 0

false false false

EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE

</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if !mso]> <style> st1\\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\"; mso-style-parent:\"\"; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;\"Calibri\",\"sans-serif\"; mso-fareast-\"Times New Roman\"; mso-bidi-\"Times New Roman\";} </style> <![endif]

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU

JUDICIAL REVIEW 61 OF 2011

REPUBLIC…………………………….…………………….…….APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF

STATE FOR PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION

AND INTERNAL SECURITY..………..……....……………1ST RESPONDENT

THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE………...……………2ND RESPONDENT

THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER

EASTERN PROVINCE..………………………………….3RD RESPONDENT

THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER

CENTRAL PROVINCE……………………………………4TH RESPONDENT

AND

ROSE WANGARI KINYUA

DAVID MUNENE KINYUA (JNR)

DAVID MUNENE KINYUA

Trading as ROSKIN AGENCIES…………..…….EXPARTE APPLICANTS

R U L I N G

By consent the parties agreed that leave be granted to the Applicant to file for Judicial Review. The Applicant desired that the leave operates as stay.  So far its only Applicant who has stated its case on the issue of stay. The Respondent is asking for more time to file a Replying Affidavit.

This being a matter that I take to be of public interest I would wish to do a comprehensive Ruling after getting the input of both counsels.

Order 53 Rule 1(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules gives room for the issue of stay to be heard separately within 7 days. I therefore grant leave for the Respondents to file a Replying Affidavit with corresponding leave to the Applicant to file a further affidavit.

Time is of essence and both counsels are called upon to comply.

Inter partes hearing on 19/10/2011.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT EMBU THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2011.

H.I. ONG’UDI

JUDGE