Rex v Omari (Con. C. 64/1931.) [1931] EACA 28 (1 January 1931)
Full Case Text
## CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION.
Before SIR JACOB BARTH, C. J.
## REX
$\boldsymbol{v}$ .
## JUMA BIN OMARI.
## Con. C. 64/1931.
The Penal Code, section 27—corporal punishment.
**Held** (25-2-31):—That there is no power to impose a sentence of imprisonment in lieu of corporal punishment.
The sentence imposed by the lower Court was: "Twenty lashes; in the event of there being any medical or other obstacles to the sentence being carried out, one year's hard labour in lieu."
The case was referred to the Attorney-General.
The Attorney-General agreed that there was no authority for imposing a sentence of imprisonment in default of a sentence of corporal punishment.
ORDER.—The sentence of twenty lashes is confirmed. There is no power to impose a sentence of imprisonment in lieu of corporal punishment. Therefore the sentence of one year's hard. labour is quashed.