S v Mabhugu & Anor (CRB 48 of 2016; HH 245 of 2017) [2017] ZWHHC 245 (10 April 2017)

1 HH 245-17 CRB 48/16 THE STATE versus TREVOR MABHUGU and LOVENESS MABHUGU HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE MUSAKWA J MASVINGO, 15, 16 February 2016 and 10 April 2017 Assessors: 1. Mr E. Gweru 2. Mr S. Mutomba Criminal Trial T. Chikwati, for the state J. Ruvengo, for the 1st accused E. Zvanaka, for the 2nd accused MUSAKWA J: In this unusual case, the two accused who are siblings are charged with murder and attempted murder. Apart from the bizarre circumstances surrounding the charges, the other unusual aspect is that the victim of the murder was the accused’s mother and the victim in the attempted murder is their sister. It is not in dispute that on 20 February 2012 and at Mabhugu village in the Gutu area the accused persons behaved strangely. In the process they attacked their mother and sister. On the following morning it was discovered that the mother had died. The post-mortem report noted multiple bruises on the neck with strangulation marks. There was a human bite mark on the right cheek and the deceased was bleeding from the nostrils. The cause of death was strangulation. In pleading not guilty the first accused’s defence is that he does not recall what transpired at the material time. This is because he was suffering from a mental illness. He was only told of what happened by those who witnessed the event. However what he recalls is HH 245-17 CRB 48/16 that after supper they retired to bed. He shared the same room with his sisters whilst the deceased used a separate room. He was only told of what happened on 23 February 2012 when he was now in Police custody. He does not recall having a misunderstanding with members of his family. Thus he had no cause to strangle his mother or to assault his elder sister, Sunungurai Mabhugu as he had cordial relations with them. The second accused’s defence is that on the day in question she together with the deceased and Sunungurai conducted prayers whilst at home. This was necessitated by the first accused’s prior warning of an impending attack on Sunungurai. However she has no recollection of what subsequently occurred. She later woke up at night and noted that the deceased and Sunungurai were not in the room they all shared with the first accused. This was unusual as the four of them had resolved to sleep in the same room on account of strange occurrences at the home. Upon enquiring with the first accused she was informed that he had sent them where it was safe. She did not pursue the issue as the first accused had recently become psychic. On the morning of 21 the first accused told her to leave the room since she was in danger of an attack by some unknown foes. The first accused then left to purportedly collect Sunungurai. The second accused was only able to leave the room when an aunt opened the door for her. That is when she observed people who had gathered at the house. The deceased leaned against the wall. She was informed that the deceased had died. She was arrested amid claims that she was mentally unwell. At the commencement of the proceedings both defence counsels applied for the court to order the examination of the accused persons in terms of s 28 of the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]. This was predicated on the strange behaviour that was exhibited by the accused persons during the commission of the offences. However, both counsels conceded that the accused persons were able to understand the proceedings. This is confirmed by their respective defence outlines. Thus the court ordered that the trial proceed. An order for psychiatric evaluation was only made at the close of the defence cases. The evidence led is not contentious, notwithstanding the bizarre conduct exhibited by the accused persons and Sunungurai as well. Warned and cautioned statements that were recorded from the accused persons were produced by consent. The state also produced, with the consent of the defence, the post-mortem report and the medical report in respect of Sunungurai. The evidence of Maria Mushoriwa and Constable Chisikana was also admitted. HH 245-17 CRB 48/16 Sunungurai who is younger to the accused persons testified that the day prior to the incident they heard voices outside the room in which they slept. This was around midnight. The two accused had previously had the same experience during her absence. Thus they conducted some prayers. Having arrived home around 6 p.m. on the material day she observed the first accused striking a chicken with an umbrella. The first accused claimed that the chicken had evil spirits. The deceased was in the kitchen whilst the second accused sat by the door to the kitchen. The first accused approached the witness and asked why her voice was failing. He suggested that they conduct prayers. They went into the dining room. As they prayed the first accused insisted that the witness should continue coughing until her voice was restored. The second accused had also joined in prayers. The first accused urged the witness to spit out. She did as directed and her voice was ultimately restored. As they stood, the first accused placed his hand on the witness’s head whilst the second accused placed her hand on the shoulder. The witness felt weak and fell down. The first accused urged her to stand and remarked that if she did not she was succumbing to the evil things they were seeing. The first accused retrieved a knife from the kitchen unit and cut the witness on the cheeks whilst the second accused held her mouth. Then the second accused prodded the witness with an umbrella. The odd thing was that the witness said she felt no pain from the knife cuts. When the deceased came from the kitchen she asked what was happening. The accused persons replied that they were cutting evil spirits. It was as if the accused persons did not appreciate who the witness was. They told the deceased to cut the witness with the knife but the deceased declined. The first accused then ordered the deceased to lie down on the blood from the witness. This, she was told, would enable her to overcome the challenges. The witness heard the deceased complain about her arm. The first accused lit a fire outside. The witness was led outside where the first accused said he wanted to burn the ‘thing’. The witness was made to lie on top of the fire. She later rose on her own and walked towards the bush. She sustained burns all over the body. She showed the court a severe burn mark on the right arm. Meanwhile the second accused was praying whilst inside the house. Having slept in the house, when the witness woke up, the accused persons were still praying. The deceased sat by the veranda. When she asked for water the first accused replied HH 245-17 CRB 48/16 that he did not know who she was. Later the first accused said he was going to collect his mother’s child. He then left for their aunt’s place. The first accused was later returned whilst bound with some ropes. Again, the odd thing was that the witness said she was affected by the manner in which the first accused was bound. In other words she felt as if she herself had been bound. Meanwhile, the second accused continued to pray. The witness was eventually taken to hospital. She only realised after a month that she had been injured. All along she had not felt any pain. Darlington Chaputika who is related to the accused persons and resides within the neighbourhood testified that the accused persons led a normal life. Early in the morning he heard his aunt crying and he went to the aunt’s home. There he saw the first accused who wore no shirt and held the shaft of an umbrella. The first accused was praying for a dumb and deaf person at the home. According to the witness the first accused was normally reserved but on this day he talked a lot. He then escorted the first accused to their home. When he arrived with the first accused he observed Sunungurai lying down. She had cuts and burns on the back. The deceased sat in the veranda with her eyes closed. When he shook the deceased she then