The court found that the plaintiff, as a life director of the 3rd defendant company, was protected by the proviso to Section 185 of the Companies Act, which prohibits the removal of a life director in a private company by ordinary resolution. The purported removal of the plaintiff was therefore unlawful. The court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with a probability of success and that she would suffer irreparable harm if excluded from the company's affairs. Accordingly, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from presenting for registration or registering the resolution removing her as director. However, the court declined to grant a mandatory injunction to expunge the resolution if already registered, as such relief would effectively determine the suit at the interlocutory stage and no special circumstances were shown. The court also declined to order accounts and payment of emoluments at this stage, holding that these issues required further evidence and could only be determined at the substantive hearing.