Simiyu v Republic [2025] KEHC 6476 (KLR) | Robbery With Violence | Esheria

Simiyu v Republic [2025] KEHC 6476 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Simiyu v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E044 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 6476 (KLR) (23 May 2025) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 6476 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Eldoret

Miscellaneous Criminal Application E044 of 2024

RN Nyakundi, J

May 23, 2025

Between

John Simiyu

Appellant

and

Republic

Respondent

Ruling

1. Before this court is an application in the case as follows:i.That this matter be certified as urgent and be heard at the first instanceii.That may the honourable court be pleased to order that, the same be given priority in hearing and determinationiii.That may the court be pleased and allow my appeal filed out of time, annexed in the supporting affidavit by the names John Simiyu with a memorandum of appealiv.That the appellant prays to be present during the hearing of this application/ appealv.That other grounds may be adduced during the hearing hereThe same is supported by an affidavit sworn by the said John Simiyu which states as follows:i.That I was convicted for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the penal code and sentenced to suffer death vide criminal case no. 3143 of2002 at CM'S court Eldoretii.That my subsequent appeal to the high court by Hon. J.M.K. Ibrahim (J) and P.M Mwilu (J) was dismissed and hence the current appeal.iii.That I humbly urge this hon court to consider my appeal filed out of time. that I had the intention to appeal. However, I was not supplied with trial court records and its judgment to enable me appeal out of timeiv.That my appeal has high chances of success. Annexed is the memorandum ground of appeal.v.That other further grounds to be adduced at the hearing of this application and appeal thereofvi.That I further swear that all that I have stated herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

2. The question is whether this court has jurisdiction to extend time to file an Appeal out of time which has been dismissed by the very court being presided over Hon. J.M.K. Ibrahim (J) and P.M Mwilu (J) as they were then Judges of the High Court. The Applicant should know that I sit in the High Court and not the Court of Appeal. It is trite that I cannot entertain an application to extend time which jurisdiction only vested in the very court he intends to seek the remedy arising out of the dismissal order by this very forum. The application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT THIS 23RDDAY OF MAY 2025……………………….…………..R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE