Star Tours and Travel Limited v Chege & another [2024] KEHC 351 (KLR) | Reinstatement Of Suit | Esheria

Star Tours and Travel Limited v Chege & another [2024] KEHC 351 (KLR)

Full Case Text

Star Tours and Travel Limited v Chege & another (Civil Case 166 of 2017) [2024] KEHC 351 (KLR) (Civ) (26 January 2024) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 351 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Civil

Civil Case 166 of 2017

AN Ongeri, J

January 26, 2024

Between

Star Tours and Travel Limited

Applicant

and

Kennedy Gichuha Chege

1st Respondent

Bebonair Travel Limited

2nd Respondent

Ruling

1. The application coming for consideration in this ruling is dated 26/6/2023 seeking the following orders;i.That this application be certified urgent and be heard ex-parte in the first instance.ii.That there be stay of execution of the judgment entered on 2nd May, 2023 and the resulting decree, pending the hearing and determination of this application inter-parties and/or further orders of the court.iii.That this honourable court be pleased to set aside its orders of dismissal made on the 4th November 2021 and reinstate this suit to be heard and determined on merit.iv.That costs of this application be in the cause.

2. The application is based on the grounds on the face of it as follows;i.That the plaintiff’s former then advocates despite been duly informed of the intention to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution failed to attend court.ii.That the order of dismissal made on 4th November 2021 was made through no fault or wrongdoing on the part of the applicant but through the fault of the advocates previously on record for the plaintiff.iii.That the applicant has at all material times in this suit been diligent in prosecuting the said suit and the mistake leading to the dismissal of the same can neither be attributed to them as they were not duly notified to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed by their then former advocates on record.iv.That the applicant stand to be greatly prejudiced should the suit herein not be reinstated.v.That in the interest of justice and fairness that this honourable court exercises its discretion in favour of the applicant and set aside the order for dismissal of the suit and reinstates the same for determination on merit as the applicant has a triable case.vi.That the application herein is made in good faith, promptly and without undue delay.And supported by the affidavit of Joan Ngugi sworn on 27/6/2023.

3. The respondents filed a replying affidavit sworn on 21/9/2023 opposing the application in which it is deposed that before the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, the suit was last in court on 11th December 2018 for a ruling on the plaintiff’s/applicant’s application to strike out the defendants’/respondents’ statement of defence and the said application was dismissed and thus when the suit came up for dismissal for want of prosecution, there was a lull or indolence on the plaintiff’s/applicant’s part for almost two years.

4. That upon dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution on 25th November, 2021, that the Applicant filed a party and party bill of costs dated 24th November 2021 and the same was served upon the plaintiff’s/applicant’s advocates on record on 22nd September, 202 together with a Notice of Taxation dated 20th September, 2022. Annexed hereto and collectively marked “A” are copies of the Party and Party Bill of Costs dated 24th November, 2021 and the Notice of Taxation dated 20th September, 2022.

5. That the Party to Party Bill of Costs came up for taxation on 27th September, 2022 and in the absence of the plaintiff’s/applicant’s advocates, a ruling on the bill of costs was reserved for 24th November, 2022.

6. That on 24th November 2022, the party and Party Bill of Costs was taxed at kshs.238,699/= and a certificate of taxation issued on 6th December 2022. Annexed hereto and marked “B” is a certificate of taxation dated 6th December, 2022.

7. That by a letter dated 7th December, 2022 the Applicant forwarded the certificate of taxation to the applicant’s/plaintiff’s advocates on record requesting the said advocates to pay the Party and Party Bill of Costs within 7 days. Annexed hereto and marked “C” is a copy of the letter dated 7th December, 2022.

8. That since no payment was forthcoming from the plaintiff/applicant, the Applicant filed the notice of motion dated 26th January, 2023 and served upon the plaintiff’s/applicant’s advocates on 8th February, 2023. Annexed hereto and marked “D” is a copy of the application dated 26th January, 2023.

9. That the plaintiff has been indolent, is guilt of laches and is undeserving of the remedies sought.

10. That the defendants’ respondents’ will be gravely prejudiced if the suit is reopened since the Applicant has information the the 2nd Defendant has lost touch with his potential witnesses and has no way of tracing or contacting them.

11. That even though the plaintiff/applicant has deponed that there was a mistake from its previous advocates on record, the plaintiff/applicant does not depone on the nature and extent of the mistake and the said advocates have not sworn an affidavit to explain themselves and this averment is clearly an afterthought.

12. The parties filed written submissions which I have duly considered.

13. The sole issue for determination is whether the suit should be reinstated for hearing.

14. I find that the court has a discretion to reinstate a suit dismissed upon certain conditions.

15. I find that it is not in dispute that the plaintiff was not aware that the suit had been dismissed.

16. It is not in the interest of justice to punish a party for the mistake of their counsel.

17. I find that the respondents will not suffer prejudice that cannot be compensated by an award of costs.

18. I allow the application dated as 26/6/2023 on the following conditions;i.That the applicant pays thrown away costs of ksh.20,000 before the suit is set down for hearing.ii.That the suit be fully prosecuted within 90 days of this date.iii.Failure to prosecute the suit within the stated period, the same to stand automatically dismissed with costs to the respondents.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024. A. N. ONGERIJUDGEIn the presence of:……………………………. for the Applicant……………………………. for the 1st Respondent……………………………. for the 2nd Respondent