The appellate court found that the trial court's assessment of general damages was not inordinately high to warrant interference. The court determined that the injuries suffered by the respondent, as evidenced by the discharge summary and medical report by Dr. Morebu, were more severe than those in the authorities cited by the appellant. The court disregarded the claim regarding metal implants due to lack of evidence but held that the respondent's hospitalization and ongoing pain justified the award. The trial court applied the correct legal principles, and the authorities relied upon were appropriate. The appellant failed to demonstrate that the trial court considered irrelevant factors, omitted relevant ones, or made an erroneous estimate. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and the award of damages upheld.