The court found that the prosecution proved all elements of gang defilement and assault causing actual bodily harm beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant was a minor at the time of the offence, as evidenced by her birth certificate. Penetration was established by medical evidence, and the identification of the appellant was corroborated by several witnesses. The court held that inconsistencies in the stated age were not fatal to the prosecution's case, as the essential fact of minority was established. The evidence of assault was corroborated by both witness testimony and medical findings. The court further held that the failure to call a particular witness was within the prosecution's discretion and did not prejudice the appellant. The appellant's defence was found to be a mere denial and insufficient to rebut the prosecution's case. The sentence imposed was within statutory limits and proportionate to the offence. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed in its entirety.