Wilson & 86 others (Suing on behalf of the residents of Chepchoina Phase III in Trans-Nzoia County) v Attorney General & 4 others [2024] KEELC 4104 (KLR)
Full Case Text
Wilson & 86 others (Suing on behalf of the residents of Chepchoina Phase III in Trans-Nzoia County) v Attorney General & 4 others (Environment & Land Case E014 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 4104 (KLR) (7 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 4104 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Environment & Land Case E014 of 2024
FO Nyagaka, J
May 7, 2024
Between
Loshakep Chumel Wilson
1st Plaintiff
Remeile Lowonotum
2nd Plaintiff
Nelson Tiamale Lisoreng
3rd Plaintiff
Domongole Lomwai
4th Plaintiff
Loice Cheponyagat Chelalywa
5th Plaintiff
Chepocherwow Lomonyang
6th Plaintiff
Isaiah Ruto Nguriatudo
7th Plaintiff
Cheposimet Loyanalee
8th Plaintiff
Nicholas Lotunale
9th Plaintiff
Salome Chemokil
10th Plaintiff
Chepayos Lonyangata
11th Plaintiff
Chepsekeu Lokul
12th Plaintiff
Loitangura Yaranyang
13th Plaintiff
David Lotuliatum
14th Plaintiff
Loliwale Ngorialem Joseph
15th Plaintiff
Losiangura Lukipak
16th Plaintiff
Augustino Aboth Lokoyer
17th Plaintiff
Chepote Riongobosi
18th Plaintiff
Simon Kipyego Lowanatum
19th Plaintiff
Benjamin Kamunai
20th Plaintiff
Amina Chemuso Lyson
21st Plaintiff
Aporokoi Patarikamar
22nd Plaintiff
Chemkan Longirokwang
23rd Plaintiff
Chepochepit Wapale Poghon
24th Plaintiff
Chepochepkai Lonyakou
25th Plaintiff
Cheplamin Paulina Loputakong
26th Plaintiff
Silas Wapes
27th Plaintiff
Hezron Mosop
28th Plaintiff
Jackson Lokere Natangole
29th Plaintiff
Jackson Longuranyang Edom
30th Plaintiff
Isaya Lokedi Kirwa
31st Plaintiff
Chepokaltilit James
32nd Plaintiff
Chepnongor Tundunye
33rd Plaintiff
Eliza Lokuruk
34th Plaintiff
Cheptoyo Nakoribok
35th Plaintiff
Chemutai Tolim
36th Plaintiff
Tuliangiro Lokol
37th Plaintiff
Sharon Chenangat Powon
38th Plaintiff
Loripo Simon Lokuruk
39th Plaintiff
Regina Apeta
40th Plaintiff
Puomol Tudoo Benson
41st Plaintiff
Daniel Tolimlemkou
42nd Plaintiff
Cheposaniak Apenyimoi
43rd Plaintiff
Peter Pkopus Mudang
44th Plaintiff
Cheposongoro Lodiongole
45th Plaintiff
Johnson Lokitamugh
46th Plaintiff
Longoriasiwa Sokol
47th Plaintiff
Nancy Chepengat Chelele
48th Plaintiff
Kapelo Kaspan Sammy
49th Plaintiff
Tuliangiro Lokodopurat
50th Plaintiff
Piraa Merinyang
51st Plaintiff
Daniel Pkite Adupa
52nd Plaintiff
Cheposetio Tabaki
53rd Plaintiff
Emmanuel Poghisho Kariwo
54th Plaintiff
Cheposaghich Yarapus
55th Plaintiff
Losianger Ngiruiye
56th Plaintiff
Selina Chenangat Lokongotono
57th Plaintiff
Chepotunyany Linganyang
58th Plaintiff
Cheposera Lokeno
59th Plaintiff
Setieng Apuot Idakong
60th Plaintiff
Simatia Kales Waija
61st Plaintiff
Karenge Lotuliatum
62nd Plaintiff
Loripo Simon Lokoruk
63rd Plaintiff
Apusikou Ngorokoo
64th Plaintiff
Pius Mnangat Daudi
65th Plaintiff
Chepocherwow Longusu Loshakong
66th Plaintiff
Chepotuturwa Kasotot
67th Plaintiff
John Ngurakapel Lomoru
68th Plaintiff
Anthony Pkiech
69th Plaintiff
Alexander Pchuma Lokorora
70th Plaintiff
Chemkam Cheptiyos Lomerilima
71st Plaintiff
Plimo Tinjaa Lodenya
72nd Plaintiff
Monica Chepokenyekia Losekur
73rd Plaintiff
Merpus Kospei Limaluk
74th Plaintiff
Selina Chemitiny Losemuk
75th Plaintiff
Kedimuk Tuper
76th Plaintiff
Cheponyorio Merpus
77th Plaintiff
Wilson Merinyang
78th Plaintiff
Tomengar Samwel Loktari
79th Plaintiff
Thomas Ngurianyang Munyuny
80th Plaintiff
Zakayo Leken Dangaluka
81st Plaintiff
Stephen Lokudokori
82nd Plaintiff
Robert Pkiach Loswa
83rd Plaintiff
Ritangoria Domoreng Kimarmar
84th Plaintiff
Reuben Poighisho Psilot
85th Plaintiff
Pkomor Lotinyang
86th Plaintiff
Real Chepleke Benson
87th Plaintiff
Suing on behalf of the residents of Chepchoina Phase III in Trans-Nzoia County
and
The Attorney General
1st Defendant
Chief Land Registrar
2nd Defendant
National Land Commission
3rd Defendant
Director Of Land Adjudication and Settlement Scheme
4th Defendant
Director of Survey
5th Defendant
Ruling
1. This matter came up on 6/5/2024 for the inter partes hearing of the application dated 15/04/2024, following directions which this court issued on the application on 15/04/2021. The Applicants and the State Counsel appearing on behalf of all except the 3rd Respondent were present. The learned counsel for the Applicants appeared virtually but all her clients were present in open court where the learned state counsel too was.
2. When the court sought to confirm about service on the 3rd Respondent, though the Applicants indicated that they had served it, there was no demonstration by way of a received document, as alleged in the affidavit of service of the process server, that indeed the said Respondent was served. Thus, the court being dissatisfied with the service indicated as much.
3. The elephant in the room was the prayer by the Applicants for the court to issue temporary orders of injunction pending the hearing of the application on another date as sought by the Respondents who were already served. The Plaintiffs prayed for issuance of the orders for reasons that they were being harassed and threatened with eviction by the Defendants and the persons who were allocated the 917 plots alleged to have been resulted from the subdivision of land Reference Number 8026. They stated that the allottees were provincial administration officers, police officers, politicians and affluent members of the public.
4. The learned state counsel opposed the grant of interim orders on the grounds of non-service on the 3rd Respondent, and also that the alleged allottees of the 917 plots would be affected and condemned unheard yet they too had a right to property. He also argued that although the court had directed that the Respondents file responses within the timelines given, the suit land in issue having been registered under the Registration of Titles Act Chapter 280 of Laws of Kenya (now repealed) the documentation thereto was in the Lands office in Nairobi Ardhi House and the same were in various offices to where he had dispatched the Lands and Settlement Officer to go and get copies therefrom and instructions thereon. He prayed for one (1) week to have the same in terms of a replying affidavit. He prayed for more time to reply and also advised that the Plaintiffs were better off seeking Alternative Dispute Resolution over the matter since they were entitled to settlement in the same manner as the alleged allottees. Lastly, he argued that there was no demonstration of a threat to the occupancy of the suit land as alleged against the Defendants.
5. Having heard the oral arguments of the parties, and considering the fact that the law requires that parties are given a hearing before decisions, adverse or otherwise, are made against them, or in their favour, it is my considered view that, as indicated earlier on 15/04/2024, the application is not urgent. Secondly, the application having not been served on the 3rd Defendant, and the interim orders sought would prejudice the party who has not been served, and given that there are as alleged in the pleadings about 917 beneficiaries who have not been included in the application and are likely to be affect by the order of this court, a grant of the interim order of injunction would be prejudicial to them and have untold ramifications. It is in the interest of justice that the parties likely to be affected by the orders contested herein be served first and they be given a hearing too. I thus decline to grant a temporary injunction at this ex parte state.
6. I direct that the National Land Commission be served with the pleadings and application. The plaintiffs are to identify the 3rd Parties whom they allege have been allocated the plots numbering 917 in Chepchoina Phase III Scheme and also serve them upon applying to enjoin them in this matter, and the court granting their application.
7. The Respondents are given 21 days to file responses and serve. the Applicants too are given 14 days from today to apply to enjoin as Defendants or Interested Parties and individuals likely to be affected by the orders of this court in this matter.
8. The application shall be heard virtually on 05/06/2024 when the court may give further directions on joinder of other parties, and any other appropriate order.
9. Orders accordingly.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KITALE VIRTUALLY VIA TEAMS PLATFORM THIS 7TH DAY OF MAY, 2024. HON. DR. IUR FRED NYAGAKAJUDGE, ELC, KITALEIn the presence of:1. Langat holding brief Jeruto for Plaintiffs2. Odongo for the Defendants3. Obino holding brief for Akello for 3rd Defendant