The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any substantial loss that would result if stay of execution was not granted. The application for stay was brought without unreasonable delay, as it was filed 15 days after the lower court dismissed a similar application. However, the applicant's main complaint related to the implementability of the 2007 decree, which should have been addressed through procedures under the now repealed Land Disputes Tribunal Act. Since no substantial loss was shown, the court declined to consider the issue of security for due performance. The application for stay of execution was therefore dismissed for lack of merit, and any temporary orders of stay previously granted were discharged.