AI-assisted research summary: This regulation sets how complaints are treated, allows informal resolution, requires police notice in one situation, and gives witnesses at formal hearings the same fees as Court of King's Bench witnesses.
Law Enforcement Review Regulation, M.R. 321/87 R The Law Enforcement Review Act , C.C.S.M. c. L75 Regulation 321/87 R Registered August 3l, 1987 bilingual version (HTML) 1(1) In processing two or more complaints respecting the same incident as it affects the same person, the Commissioner shall deem one person to be the complainant. 1(2) Where an affected person and a third person each submit a complaint respecting the same incident in respect of the affected person, the Commissioner shall deem the affected person to be the complainant irrespective of the sequence in time in which the complaints are received. 2 The complainant and the respondent may, at any stage of the proceedings under the Act, agree to resolve the complaint informally and the Commissioner may thereafter suspend any further action and resolve the complaint in accordance with the agreement. 3 Where conduct leading to a complaint is to be investigated by the internal investigation unit of the respondent's department for the possible laying of criminal charges against the respondent, the Chief of Police of the department shall inform the Commissioner of this intention. 4 Witnesses attending at formal hearings of the Commissioner to give testimony under oath are entitled to receive the same fees as are payable to witnesses in the Court of King's Bench. 5 The notice of an alleged disciplinary default required to be served on the respondent under subsection 17(2) of the Act shall be in the form set out in the Schedule. SCHEDULE Notice of alleged disciplinary default and referral to the law enforcement review board under The Law Enforcement Review Act