Presumptions of ownership of property and businesses by non-citizens
Verify source ↗ AI-assisted research summary: This section says certain property or businesses held in a citizen’s name may be presumed to belong to a non-citizen in specified nominee or family arrangements.
3. Presumptions of ownership of property and businesses by non-citizens Where, during the life time of any non-citizen — (a) any real property or any interest therein is, by any deed or other instrument of title, or by any lease or tenancy agreement, expressed to be owned or held under the terms thereof by, or where any such ownership or interest is, under the provisions of any written law, registered in the name of, any citizen who is— (i) the spouse or child of such non-citizen ; or (ii) under any arrangement or agreement written or unwritten, holding title or possession of such land or interest, as the case may be, solely for and on behalf of such non-citizen ; or (iii) part owner only of such land or interest, the other part being in the disclosed or undisclosed ownership of such non-citizen ; or (b) any trade, business or occupation is being carried on in Malawi in the name of any citizen who is— (i) the spouse or child of such non-citizen ; or (ii) under any arrangement or agreement, written or unwritten, carrying on such trade, business or occupation, as the case may be, solely for and on behalf of such non-citizen ; or (iii) in partnership with such non-citizen whether disclosed or undisclosed, in any such trade, business or occupation; or (c) any bank account, thing in action, chattel or other personal property of any kind is credited in favour of, held, or possessed as owner by, or in the name of, any citizen who is— (i) the spouse or child of such non-citizen ; or (ii) under any arrangement or agreement, written or unwritten, controlling, holding, or possessing such bank account, thing in action, chattel or other personal property as the case may be solely for and on behalf of such non-citizen ; or (iii) part owner only of such bank account, thing in action, chattel, or other personal property, the other part being in the disclosed or undisclosed ownership of such non-citizen , such real property, or interest therein, or such trade, business or occupation, or such bank account, thing in action, chattel or other personal property shall, for the purposes of, and for the giving effect to any Order made under the Forfeiture Act declaring such non-citizen to be subject to forfeiture, be presumed to be in the sole ownership or possession of the said non-citizen ; and where such, trade, business or occupation is, under any written law, required to be licensed or registered, and is so licensed or registered in the name of such citizen , and such non-citizen commits any act or omission which, if he were the person so licensed or registered, would, under such law, or any other written law, constitute lawful grounds for the cancellation of such licence or registration, or which would cause the appropriate Minister to exercise the powers of cancellation conferred by section 62 of the General Interpretation Act, it shall be presumed that the said trade, business or occupation, for the purposes of cancelling such licence or registration, was at all times, and is, in the sole ownership of the said non-citizen , and the licence or registration, as the case may be, issued or entered in respect of such trade, business or occupation may be cancelled as if the said non-citizen were the person in whose name such licence or registration were effected; and if such trade, business or occupation be subject to the Businesses Licensing Act and licensed thereunder in the name of the said citizen , the said business, trade or occupation shall be presumed to be in the sole ownership of the said non-citizen , and the said non-citizen shall be presumed to be the licensee under the said Act for the purposes of the application and implementation of the provisions of Part VI of the said Businesses Licensing Act: Provided, however, that any presumption imposed and enacted by this section may be rebutted by the citizen proving to the satisfaction of the appropriate Minister that his title to or possession of such real property, or interest therein, or to such trade, business or occupation, or to any share or partnership therein, or to such bank account, thing in action, chattel of other personal property was acquired by him legitimately and in good faith or validly for sufficient and adequate valuable consideration, and such presumption shall stand rebutted solely to the extent proved by such evidence. [Cap. 14:06] [Cap. 1:01] [Cap. 46:01]
Referenced legislation
- Businesses Licensing Act (resolved)
- General Interpretation Act (resolved)
- Forfeiture Act (unresolved)