Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works Amendment Act
This amendment lets the director refuse an application if the person was medically examined under the Act within the previous 24 months, unless the application is supported in writing by a medical practitioner.
AI-assisted research synopsis — verify against the official legal text below.
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Instrument
- Act or statute
- Citation
- Act 60 of 2002
- Version
- Undated source snapshot
- Language
- en
- Updated
- Official source
- View official record ↗
Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing
This page remains available for direct access and API use, but this release emits
noindex,follow for the following reason:
- The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria.
(market-indexing-disabled)
Statute overview
About this statute
This amendment lets the director refuse an application if the person was medically examined under the Act within the previous 24 months, unless the application is supported in writing by a medical practitioner. The owner of a controlled mine or controlled works must pay the reasonable, proven medical-aid costs for certain workers affected by a compensatable disease. Any person must not make false statements, conceal material facts, forge or alter certain documents, or charge excessive fees for help with benefit claims; doing so is an offence. The Act is amended by replacing masculine pronouns with gender-inclusive alternatives, unless the context indicates otherwise. This section states the short title of the Act.
Ask AI about this statute
Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works Amendment Act
Sign in to ask AI about this statute
Sign in to start authenticated, citation-grounded statute research.
Sign in