Minnesota Statutes § 103G.289 - WELL INTERFERENCE; WELL SEALING

The commissioner must not validate a well interference claim, and must dismiss the complaint, if the affected well was sealed before the investigation was finished.

AI-assisted research synopsis — verify against the official legal text below.

Jurisdiction: United States — Minnesota
Instrument: Act or statute
Version: Undated source snapshot
Language: en
Updated: 1 Jan 2025
Official source: View official record ↗

complaint processing water wells

Statute overview

About this statute

This page preserves the statute’s identified version, provision structure, official source link, and stored legal text for reading and research.

Read the provisions Ask with citations

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the legislation currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

AI-generated material is explicitly labelled and published only through LexChat's quality controls. It is a research aid, not the source document.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.

Minnesota Statutes § 103G.289 - WELL INTERFERENCE; WELL SEALING

About this statute

Search within this statute

Provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 103G.289 - WELL INTERFERENCE; WELL SEALING

Ask AI about this statute

Sign in to ask AI about this statute