Bank of Zambia (Amendment) Act, 1993 | Act 36 of 1993 — Zambia law | Esheria

Bank of Zambia (Amendment) Act, 1993

The subsection is replaced so that the Bank’s authorised capital is twenty million kwacha, unless the Board determines another amount after consulting the Minister.

AI-assisted research synopsis — verify against the official legal text below.

Jurisdiction
Zambia
Instrument
Act or statute
Citation
Act 36 of 1993
Version
8 Sept 1993
Language
en
Official source
View official record ↗
amendment amendments audit timing bank services banking board procedure central bank credit limits compliance corporate governance criminal-penalties director appointment eligibility for bank directors external audit financial regulation financial reporting financial statements fines government borrowing government payments interest on balances monetary amount monetary threshold penalties statutory amendment

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

This page remains available for direct access and API use, but this release emits noindex,follow for the following reason:

  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (market-indexing-disabled)

Statute overview

About this statute

The subsection is replaced so that the Bank’s authorised capital is twenty million kwacha, unless the Board determines another amount after consulting the Minister. This section amends section six of the principal Act by inserting a timing phrase about action within sixty days after the auditor certifies the Bank’s financial statements. This provision amends section 10 of the principal Act by deleting paragraph (c) and replacing it with new wording about seven directors appointed by the Minister. Section 11 is replaced, and the new rule says a person cannot be appointed director of the Bank if they are an MP, have certain ties to a regulated financial institution or the Government, or have ever been convicted of dishonesty. The Board may make rules for the bank’s affairs and meeting procedures, as long as those rules are not inconsistent with the Act.